That's not to say you'll never see them, but this test was specifically designed to break the cameras, and while the Mark III came out on top, it's also $1,000 more expensive. If you're not trying to shoot a lot of detailed wide shots, most of the problems you see above will be out of focus in the background. I would be fine shooting with the 6D, as I loved the Mark II except for the little quirks that have been improved upon (though we're still missing the headphone port).
It may be disappointing to some that the 6D won't be as good as the Mark III, but it's clear they've put most of their energy into a few select models and will basically recycle video into the other cameras as they see fit. The 6D has other considerations that make it a better camera than the Mark II, like the HDMI output, the internal recording codec, etc., so all of these things would be upgrades for anyone who has been hindered by those in the past. If you've been using the Mark II forever and you haven't run into anything that has bothered you considerably, I don't think the 6D will be much different. Canon made sure that was the flagship of these cameras, and it's still the best-looking camera under the 1D X, which is debatably a little sharper, possibly at the cost of letting in a bit more false color. Given the difference in sensors and age of the two bodies we should expect there to be a difference, but right now it's a considerable one.Ĭonsidering either camera? Check out our best deals below.It's clear that the 6D is not going to best the 5D Mark III. Then comes the price the older Canon EOS 7D Mark II is around a third cheaper than the newer EOS 6D Mark II. Additionally, its build quality is a tad better. It also has an autofocus system with a wider AF-point array and twin memory card slots. Its continuous shooting mode is considerably faster, and it can maintain this for longer too. So does the EOS 7D Mark II outperform the EOS 6D Mark II in any areas at all? Yes it does. Its pentaprism viewfinder is also larger.Īnother clear benefit of the EOS 6D Mark II is its superior battery life, which gives almost twice the shots as the disappointing 670 shot-life of the EOS 7D Mark II. Handling wise, it's more versatile too, with wireless control and a fully articulated LCD screen with touch technology.
#Canon 5d mark iii vs 6d mark ii iso#
The new camera features a larger sensor, higher-resolution images and greater ISO sensitivity range. Both have a similar control layout, though know your way around one and the adjustment to the other will be quick.īoth bodies can be used with optional grips for extra battery life VerdictĪs we can see from the EOS 6D Mark II's main features, three years is quite some time in terms of digital camera technology. However, the EOS 7D MK II is heavier at 910g to 765g. battery and card)īoth cameras are classed as mid-size DSLRs, with virtually the same dimensions. Canon EOS 6D Mark II vs Canon EOS 7D Mark II: Build and design Put the cameras side by side and the viewfinder of the EOS 6D Mark II presets a slightly larger view – and that’s one of the benefits of the larger sensor format. It does, however, only show approximately 98% of the scene, as opposed to the approximate 100% coverage of the EOS 7D Mark II's viewfinder.Įven so, when both viewfinder and LCD are considered together, it's the EOS 6D Mark II that comes out on top. The result is a 0.63x equivalent magnification. The EOS 7D Mark II has a superior 1x magnification to the 0.71x magnification of the EOS 6D Mark II, but that does not take into account the 1.6x crop factor. The EOS 7D Mark II's screen is fixed to the back of the camera and is not sensitive to touchĪs for the viewfinders, they are somewhat similar, although viewfinder specifications can be confusing when you compare across sensor formats.
0 kommentar(er)
